You are here

Yellowstone Bison Numbers Plummet

Share

Published Date

March 4, 2006

    Yellowstone National Park's bison population has dropped significantly since last summer, in large part due to the capture of more than 900 animals, most of which were shipped to slaughterhouses. Park officials say the latest count shows roughly 3,500 bison, which is down from a high of 4,900 counted late last summer but still above the goal of 3,000.
Ynp_bison_2     Yellowstone's bison culling program is designed not around the park's carrying capacity for bison, but rather to protect Montana's brucellosis-free status. Sadly, most of the 939 bison captured under guidelines established by the Interagency Bison Management Plan were not tested for brucellosis, so it's hard to say how many of those animals posed a threat to Montana's cattle industry.

    Brucellosis is a disease that can cause cattle to abort their unborn fetuses. Interestingly, the disease was introduced to wild bison and elk from cattle.
    Efforts to keep the bison from heading north into Montana this winter generated quite a bit of negative publicity for the park and Montana. Two bison drowned during a hazing operation intended to drive a band of the animals back into the park, and the fact that hundreds of bison were shipped off to slaughter was not well-received.
    Opponents of the management plan continue to criticize the way officials are dealing with the issue. Josh Osher, a representative of the Buffalo Field Campaign, told The Associated Press that the goal of culling Yellowstone's bison herd to 3,000 animals is based on politics, not science.
    Of course, if the park achieves its population goal, how will officials deal with bison that still head north of Yellowstone's border in search of forage?
    Earlier this winter the Greater Yellowstone Coalition proposed a solution to the annual problem, although it remains to be seen whether officials will take the group up on it. 

Comments

"Yellowstone Bison Numbers Plummet". These are the Kind of headlines that give most of the cubicle people a misunderstanding of the goals of the experts in charge. They Culled most of those Bison. "Opponents of the management plan continue to criticize the way officials are dealing with the issue". What would be their plan? We have seen some of Ideas /2006/02/greater_yellows.html The opponents can never be satisfied and most of the time never have an ansewer Over populating any ecosystem will have its consequences,transfering the herd sounds good,disease, is natures way,culling is the extreme. Did the opponents have children? What happens when humans over populate or have we already? Lets talk about that. Yellowstone will be fine with 3000 bison. Over poulating the earth is the real issue. My suggestion to help prevent over population is to continue to expose as many people to places like yellowstone and while in the park start a diologe of over populating the earth as well as over populating our parks with wildlife and what the consequences may be,transfer, disease or worse culling. Preservation is only part of the ansewer to our survival.

Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.