You are here

Home » Burlington Northern's Bombing Plans For Glacier, Part Two

Burlington Northern's Bombing Plans For Glacier, Part Two

Share

Published Date

October 6, 2006

    Some more details are surfacing regarding the apparent determination by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway to bomb Glacier National Park's southern flanks in the name of avalanche control.
    As I noted earlier this week, the railroad says it wants to resort to lobbing 105 mm shells into the park rather than maintain snow sheds, structures it has been using along the tracks that run along Glacier's southern boundary since 1920 or so in the name of avalanche control, because it would be cheaper.
    Well, as Montana's Missoulian newspaper points out in a story about this issue, Burlington Northern had revenues of $13 BILLION last year, when it realized a 73 PERCENT increase in operating income.
    Now, another interesting tidbit of this story is that the National Park Service, already hemorrhaging more than $800 million annually in its operating funds, would actually help pay for the railroad's bombing if legislation moving through Congress gains approval.
   

    Yep, that's right. The Park Service would be dinged, as would the U.S. Forest Service, under legislation introduced by members of Alaska's congressional delegation, to the tune of $75 million.
    Now, should it come as any surprise that, according to the Missoulian, an avalanche expert who works for the Alaska Railroad Corporation actually helped write this legislation? Park Service officials testified in opposition, but, well, they don't line the pockets of senators and congressmen as do railroads.
    Now, one question that I haven't seen addressed anywhere is who, in case this awful legislation gains final approval, will be responsible for hiking into Glacier's backcountry to recover any undetonated ordnance?
    Think Burlington Northern executives would volunteer for the task?

Support National Parks Traveler

National Parks Traveler is a small, editorially independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit media organization. The Traveler is not part of the federal government nor a corporate subsidiary. Your support helps ensure the Traveler's news and feature coverage of national parks and protected areas endures. 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Submitted by admin on October 7, 2006 - 7:09am.
I e-mailed Mary Riddle, a ranger at Glacier asking if A) the park is preparing an Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement and B) Who will retrieve the unexploded bombs - excuse me, ordnances. Her answer is as follows: We are preparing an EIS on Burlington Northern's request. It should be back from the printer by the end of the month. It will be available online. Regarding information on the bill, S225 passed the Senate in 2005, but did not pass the House. HR 2039 in the House Version and called the Federal Land Recreation Visitor Protection Act, Avalanche Control on Public Lands. It however, at this point may be attached to another bill. But hope this helps. As I understand it, the bill would make a pot of money available that could be applied for by other agencies and private companies. As for who goes after unexploded ordnance's I assumer that would be worked out for each park, forest or wherever. Regarding this situation, I believe the EIS when it is released will answer your questions. The bill of course would apply to much more than Glacier National Park. And yes, we are not in the position to pay for this type of acitivty. And we have concerns about impacts to park resources. As a high school kid in Tennessee, I probably can't do much except write letters about this (or the destruction of Harper's Ferry), but I can try. Let's hope that for once the NPS doesn't give into private interests...

Submitted by admin on October 7, 2006 - 9:42am.
Subsidized public lands grazing. Subsidized killing of native wildlife on behalf of public lands ranchers. Subsidized road building on national forests to benefit private industry. Subsidized logging of those same forests. And now a railroad gets a hand-up too? Subsidizing Amtrak (in fact, rebuilding the nation's passenger railroad network on the scale of a Marshall Plan) is entirely appropriate. But this?

Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.