Dean Potter did the dirty deed Sunday morning as the sun was rising across southeastern Utah. A professional climber supported by outdoor-wear manufacturer Patagonia, Potter claims to have studied the iconic arch for years before free-climbing to the top of the arch and rappelling down.
Seems Potter was having so much fun that he made the climb more than once before calling it a day. Never mind the fact that park rules prohibit climbing on named arches in the park.
While Potter's climb was condemned by park officials, he doesn't think he did anything wrong.
"I am very conscientious about following nature's rules," he told the Salt Lake Tribune. "I respected the arch to the fullest. I did no more than blow a little dust off a few handholds. What has our world come to if we cannot join in nature by climbing one of nature's most beautiful features?"
Well, Dean, I can see some problems, at least for other park visitors. When the climbing ban is respected, the many park visitors who make the three-mile round-trip hike to view the arch see a work of wonder, a piece of whimsy created by erosion. Imagine if those same folks had to view Delicate Arch while it was draped with climbers.
While I admire climbers and their skills, there are some places where they should refrain from setting hand- or toe-hold.
As for park officials? Park Superintendent Laura Joss says she thought the park rules clearly prohibited climbing on Delicate Arch and other named arches. However, if it's not clear, she adds, "we will work with our solicitor posthaste to put a closure on Delicate Arch immediately."
Someone else who needs to do some soul-searching are the publicity folks at Patagonia, who alerted media about Potter's climb without realizing it was against park rules.
Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places
Comments
Dean has always been flashy and seeks after firsts. Heck of a climber, but an ambassador for climbers - he is no Fritz Wiesner. Some things are better left unclimbed.
For those of you who are interested, here is a story from Outside Online which it says is the full story on this climb: http://outside.away.com/outside/features/200606/dean-potter-delicate-arc.... The story is pretty clear that there were several people involved in this stunt. If he truly respects the arch to the fullest as he says he does, he would have never touched it. The vast majority of us do not need a rule to tell us not to climb it.
Wikipedia also has an interesting article concerning Mr. Potter: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_Potter. Some of his quotes are very revealing. The article does point out that he lost his sponsorship from Patgonia for this incident.
Finally, here is the official statement from Patagonia and Mr. Potter: http://outside.away.com/outside/features/200606/patagonia-dean-potter-de....
A park superintendent might not be expected to know all of the rules off the top of her head. They would be expected, in my opinion, to find out before commenting. They would also be expected to know the process for rulemaking without begging off on the Office of the Solicitor. Very strange.
This is what the park compendium of superintendent's orders says:
Any arch or natural bridge named on the United States Geological Survey 7.5 minute topographical maps covering Arches National Park is closed to climbing year-round.
Violating a closure subjects one to fine or imprisonment under part 1 of 36 CFR. Let's hope that the park law enforcement staff is less confused than Ms. Joss.
This is what the park compendium of superintendent's orders now says:
Any arch or natural bridge named on the United States Geological Survey 7.5 minute topographical maps covering Arches National Park is closed to climbing year-round.
Violating a closure subjects one to fine or imprisonment under part 1 of 36 CFR.