You are here

Community Lists Requirements It Wants Approved Before Supporting Maine North Woods National Park

Published Date

February 9, 2015

A community close to the proposed Maine North Woods National Park has drafted a letter that outlines the requirements it would like to see met before it could support such a park.

The letter (attached below) drafted by the Town Manager of Millinocket to U.S. Sen. Angus King, Maine's former governor, touches on a number of issues, from air quality and the eventual size of such a park to free access for Maine residents. In the letter, Town Manager Margaret Daigle said the town wants the park limited to 150,000 acres in size, a far cry from the 3.2 million-acre proposal initially outlined by park proponents. 

More recently, though, those pushing for a park have agreed with a 150,000-acre park, half of which would be designated like a national recreation area with more of a multiple-use philosophy than a traditional national park that could be more restrictive when it comes to snowmobiling and logging, two traditional uses of Maine lands.

Talk of creating a national park in Maine's North Woods has been kicking around for roughly 20 years. Supporters say such a park would provide an economic boost to the region that has suffered through shrinkage of the timber industry, preserve a breathtaking landscape, help wildlife species threatened with extinction for lack of habitat, and protect the "wild forests of New England."

But there are concerns that a national park would bring restrictive policies that could stymie economic growth beyond tourism.

"The working forest was, and still remains, a major economic engine in northern Maine and the Council has concerns that a proposed park could adversely affect the forest products industry and may place significant restrictions on areas surrounding the park," wrote Ms. Daigle. "In addition, it is believed historically that the National Park Service has been littered with eminent domain proceedings that have dislodged many families and adopted policies against recreational pursuits that are highly valued in the Katahdin Region, such as snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles, and hunting.

"The Council fears that a new national park woudl adversely affect the forest products industry and traditional recreational uses, and may place significant restrictions on areas surrounding the park, such as the operation or expansion of the area's industrial (smoke stack) businesses."

The letter, which the town council is expected to review this week and decide whether to send it, also touches on:

* Air quality. The region currently is classified as a Class 2 airshed, and the letter opposes any changes to that, noting that a more restrictive classification could block some industries from settling in the town.

* Construction of a road linking Millinocket to an area proposed for an entrance to the park.

* Land easements for creation of multiple-use trails that would connect Millinocket to the proposed park and its associated recreation area.

* Establishment of a national park authority or board comprised of representatives from surrounding communities and the recreation industry to provide guidance to the National Park Service in management of the proposed park. 

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Kind of sounds like when the locals opposed Teton NP back in the day. A 150K acre NP sounds small.


You are right; those who resist a national park in the Maine Woods have the same basic rationale as those who opposed including Jackson Hole in Teton National Park. They think that resource extraction offers a better economic future than the tourism and new businesses and residents that would be attracted by a national park. That belief has been proven totally wrong in Jackson, WY and a number of studies indicate that it is also wrong in northern Maine.

You underestimate the size of the proposed 100,000 acre National Park and 50,000 acre National Recreation Area, compared to existing National Parks. Here are the 18 National Parks (29 percent of total NPs) that are smaller than the proposed park in the Maine Woods:

• Hot Springs (AR), 5,549 acres

• American Samoa (AS), 9,000 acres

• Virgin Islands (VI), 14,689 acres

• Congaree (SC), 21,867 acres

• Pinnacles (CA), 26,000 acres

• Black Canyon of the Gunnison (CO), 27,705 acres

• Haleakala (HI), 28,099 acres

• Wind Cave (SD), 28,295 acres

• Cuyahoga Valley (OH), 32,947 acres

• Bryce Canyon (UT), 35,835 acres

• Carlsbad Caverns (NM), 46,766 acres

• Acadia (ME), 47,738 acres

• Mesa Verde (CO) 52,122 acres

• Mammoth Cave (KY), 52,830 acres

• Dry Tortugas (FL), 64,700 acres

• Theodore Roosevelt (ND), 70,447 acres

• Great Basin (NV), 77,180 acres

• Guadalupe Mountains (TX), 86,415 acres


Accurately reading 'resource extraction' to mean consumption.


The last requirement seems a bit tricky, but this looks like a very good gesture by Millinocket.


Donate Popup

The National Parks Traveler keeps you informed on how politics impact national parks and protected areas.

Become a sustaining member.

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.