You are here

Only Two Aging Wolves Left At Isle Royale National Park

Share
The last two wolves known to live on Isle Royale/Rolf Peterson, Michigan Tech U

The last two wolves known to live on Isle Royale/Rolf Peterson, Michigan Tech University

Just two aging wolves remain at Isle Royale National Park, while the park's moose population has swelled to nearly 1,500, numbers that stand to change if the National Park Service moves forward with a plan to bring wolves from Canada to the park.

While formal approval of the Park Service's plan has yet to be made, Balsam fir forests on Isle Royale, an island in Michigan's Lake Superior, are vanishing in large part due to heavy browsing by moose, according to the latest ecological study of the two species. Without intervention, the biologists who wrote the study -- Rolf O. Peterson, John A. Vucetich, and Sarah R. Hoy -- predict the park's wolves will vanish and the island ecosystem will suffer.

"The wolf population is also almost certainly headed for extinction, and wolf predation has been effectively absent as an ecological process for the past seven years," reads the summary of Ecological Studies of Wolves on Isle Royale, an annual report of which the latest edition was released Thursday.

"Moose abundance probably increased over the past year even though the most recent point estimate declined from 1,600 to 1,475 moose based on the moose census in 2018. In the absence of wolf predation, moose abundance may double over the next four or five years. If that happens, it will be the largest number of moose ever observed during the six-decade history of the wolf-moose project."

Park Service officials outlined a plan in March in which they would bring 20-30 wolves from Canada into Isle Royale over a three-year period. When final approval might come is unknown.

Chronic inbreeding has impacted the wolf population. There was hope that "ice bridges" that formed between Isle Royale and the Canadian mainland during the winter of 2013-14 would enable wolves to arrive from Canada with new genes. But no wolves reached the island, while one female left and was killed by a gunshot wound in February 2014 near Grand Portage National Monument in Minnesota.

Isle Royale wolves have been in decline for more than a decade. In recent years, park managers have discussed island and wolf management with wildlife managers and geneticists from across the United States and Canada, and have received input during public meetings and from Native American tribes of the area. Those discussions have examined the question of whether wolves should be physically transported to Isle Royale, in large part due to concerns that a loss of the predators would lead to a boom in the moose population that likely would over-browse island vegetation.

Across Isle Royale balsam fir has declined about 75% since 1846, reduced from 36% in the original land survey to 9% in 2010 (U.S. Forest Service data). Moose browsing is the primary driver of this decline on the west end of Isle Royale. Under the dense hardwood canopy of the western half of the island, where fir is further limited by light and germination sites, moose browsing largely eliminated growth of regenerating fir trees in the past 100 years. In the absence of regeneration, balsam fir would eventually disappear. In fact, over 90% of a sample of west-end fir trees tagged in 1988 have now died without replacement by new fir. In the late 2000s, quite unexpectedly, long-suppressed fir saplings at the west end of the island, often decades-old but still less than a meter tall, began to grow because browsing by moose was reduced. The moose population was reduced because wolves, buoyed by genetic rescue a decade earlier, preyed on moose at a higher level than previously seen on Isle Royale. -- Ecological Studies of Wolves on Isle Royale

The study of wolf-moose interactions on Isle Royale marked their 60th year this past winter. From those six decades of study biologists have determined that, during healthy times, the wolf population "typically varies from 18 to 27 animals, organized into three packs. The moose population usually numbers between 700 and 1,200 moose."

Without wolf predation, Isle Royale's moose population has risen to nearly 1,500, or nearly 3 per square kilometer/Michigan Tech University, Rolf Peterson

But inbreeding woes and the lack of long-standing ice bridges have conspired to bring down the wolf population to just the two aging animals seen this past winter.

"The pair are closely related—both as siblings and as father-daughter—and the inbreeding within the island's isolated wolf population is what contributed to their demise," this year's study said. "The wolves’ numbers started plummeting in 2009, declining by 88 percent from 24 to 2 wolves for that period; historical levels of wolves typically varied between 18 and 27. The pair, aged eight and ten years old, may have produced a pup several years ago but the female has continued to reject the male as a mate."

While an ice bridge did form briefly this past February, it tied the island to Ontario for just a week before breaking up.

"With fewer ice bridges and warmer winters, the chances of wolves recovering naturally are slim," the study said.

An interesting aspect of the study is that moose on Isle Royale are shrinking in size, something researchers believe is tied both to warmer winters and population density.

In a 2017 paper published in Global Change Biology, we demonstrated that moose who experience warm winters during their first year of life end up later in life with smaller skulls – an indication of smaller overall body size. We also found that skull size was smaller for moose born in years when moose were more abundant – because more moose means less food for each moose. Between 1960 and 2000, mean skull size has declined by 16%.  Approximately a fifth of that decline is attributable to climate and much of the rest was due to increasing density. That increase in density was largely due to the collapse of predation. It is widely known among moose biologists that smaller moose tend not to live as long. -- Ecological Studies of Wolves on Isle Royale

Moose have decimated Balsam fir on the island through their browsing/Michigan Tech University, Rolf Peterson

Comments

We were at Isle Royale in the Summer of 2016 and met Rolf Peterson.  He believes we need to reintroduce new wolves and he's been advocating it for several years now.  He also thinks they have moved too slow.  I completely agree with him.  For the longterm health of the island we need the wolves returned.


Julie, you raise a good point. I've talked to Rolf as well, and understand his point. But should national parks be managed, essentially, as open air zoos, or allowed to ebb and flow with what nature tosses at them? It's an interesting question. How active should the Park Service be in managing natural resources in the park system?

Anyone else with any thoughts on this?


It's an interesting question.  I'm of the opinion that wolves may be introduced to Isle Royale in the context of the NPS policy of restoring species extirpated by human activities.

1. In the 1980s and, I believe, the 1990s, human activity resulted in the deaths of wolves already on the island.

2. Wolves were nearly extripated from the Great Lakes region by human activity, so, as with the Rocky Mountains, why not (re)introduce them to the region at the site of a national park (i.e. Yellowstone)?

3. I'm guessing that human-caused reduction of habitat and wilderness corridors, as well as lower numbers of wolves (despite their rebound in recent years), has decreased the odds of wolves reaching the island in the event of an ice bridge forming.

4. I wonder if the wolves who crossed over to the island in the 1940s were actually funneled in that direction because of habitat loss.


Isle Royale is a designated wilderness. Therefore, the ecosystem should be allowed to function without human interference. The potential die-out of wolves and impacts on moose should simply be part of the ongoing studies. Nature isn't always nice or pretty in our human view, but we need to accept that.


I always find these topics fascinating and thought provoking. I tend to agree with Mike on this one. It is after all nature that is responsible for their demise. We can debate all day on mans roll in this but I say don't interfere. I am also curious as to why the researchers think the same inbreeding problem wont eventually occur even if new packs are introduced. I would also think a great deal could be learned by observing what happens without the wolves as well as lots of regret if the ice bridges form again in the coming years.


In my personal opinionated opinion, debating man's role is only an academic exercise in debating the degree of man's role. It would appear, and again - in my opinion - that only one with an agenda would argue that man has had zero role.


In this case, it's not an academic exercise--it's a legal one, since Isle Royale is a congressinally-designated wilderness. I have no problem with wildlife restoration programs in general, when they are undertaken to remedy human-caused ecological imbalances.


Good comments all around. Although mine is that geared towards immediate "whatever it takes" to preserve the balance between predator and prey (i.e. wolves & moose).

Not, "good ole boy special hunts" culling overpopulated moose to "help" the local economy. Wrong answer. Nor studying, analyzing, re-studying, pumping out dust laden report after dust laden bureaucratic reports on the topic.

Get wolf diversity back out there. It's not their fault the climate has warmed and cut off a migration portal. The aforementioned congressional system is slow and archaic. Capture some starving wolves from AK and other areas, relocate them there. Then watch the balance return. 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.