You are here

Groups Support Efforts To Keep Pipeline From Crossing A.T., Blue Ridge Parkway

Share

Published Date

January 28, 2020

Supreme Court asked to uphold lower court's ruling barring gas pipeline from crossing the Appalachian National Scenic Trail.

Editor's note: This corrects final quote to Pam Underhill, former superintendent of the Appalachian Trail.

Any gas pipelines that cross the Appalachian National Scenic Trail or the Blue Ridge Parkway need to be approved by Congress, not simply the U.S. Forest Service, according to an amicus brief filed with the U.S. Supreme Court by former National Park Service Director Jon Jarvis, the trail's former superintendent, the National Parks Conservation Association, and the Coalition to Protect America's National Parks.

The Atlantic Coast Pipeline is one of two pipeline projects -- the other is the Mountain Valley Pipeline -- that would thread through West Virginia, Virginia and North Carolina. Those two projects would require nearly 1,000 miles of pipeline along with a number of compressor stations. 

The Appalachian Trail was originally envisioned as a "'super trail' along the mountain crests of the eastern wilderness," notes the National Park Service. "(Benton) MacKaye saw the Appalachian Trail as an escape from the evils of modern life and as 'a moral equivalent to war.'"

While sections of the 2,180+-mile trail do traverse wilderness-quality landscapes, the crush of society has created views of cities, industry, and highways along some sections today.

In December 2018 a unanimous U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled (attached below) that the U.S. Forest Service lacked the authority to OK construction of the Atlantic Coast natural gas pipeline across the Appalachian Trail, or any lands managed by the National Park Service, for that matter. Last June the company behind the pipeline, Dominion Energy's Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC, asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the lower court's ruling.

Last week Jarvis, NPCA, the Coalition, and Pam Underhill, who served as the A.T.'s superintendent before she retired from the Park Service, asked the high court to consider its friend of the court brief (attached below).

"The question presented is whether the Appalachian Trail is a unit of the National Park System due to the fact that Congress charged the Park Service with administration of the Trail, and, therefore, whether the Forest Service lacks authority to grant pipeline rights-of-way across the Trail pursuant to the Mineral Leasing Act," reads a section of the brief filed by William S. Eubanks II of the Fort Collins, Colorado, law firm of Eubanks & Associates, LLC. "In the Mineral Leasing Act, Congress stated that '[r]ights-of-way through any Federal lands may be granted by the Secretary of the Interior or appropriate agency head,' but explicitly exempted from that authority all pipeline rights-of-way in or through 'lands in the National Park System. . . .'

"Petitioners’ flimsy arguments that the Appalachian Trail does not constitute 'land[ ] within the National Park System' are legally and factually groundless."

Theresa Pierno, NPCA's president and CEO, said allowing the pipeline project to proceed without Congress's explicit approval would be disastrous.

“Dominion Energy’s latest reckless proposal is a massive pipeline through a much-beloved national park site. If allowed, the Atlantic Coast Pipeline would set a dangerous precedent by enabling corporations to irresponsibly develop public lands that belong to all of us," she said. "The law is clear – developers cannot slice through federal lands in national park sites without explicit approval from Congress. In fact, the law was specifically written to protect parks from this kind of activity, and developers do not get to circumvent the law to serve their own needs. That’s not what parks are for."

Jarvis, who served as Park Service director during President Obama's two terms, added that, "(T)he Appalachian Trail is a jewel in our National Park System, offering hikers over 2,000 miles of scenic vistas and stunning landscapes. Millions of visitors each year seek out the peace and tranquility along this wild and undeveloped trail and hundreds of thousands of volunteers give their time to maintain the footpath. The idea that a massive corporation could run a pipeline across this trail and carve up such a beautiful and unspoiled landscape is appalling. Other options for their pipeline were available."

"Constant vigilance will be required on the part of Trail enthusiasts and managers to have a shot at securing the Trail’s long-term protection, even with its elevated standing as a unit of our national park system. Adherence to existing federal protections is essential," said Underhill.

In 2017, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission granted Atlantic Coast Pipeline LLC (Atlantic) authorization to construct, operate, and maintain a natural gas pipeline that would cross the Appalachian Trail at points located within the George Washington and Monogahela National Forests. After a review process, the Forest Service authorized Atlantic to proceed with construction of the pipeline, finding it had authority under the Mineral Leasing Act to grant a right-of-way for the pipeline and that the pipeline “would have no long lasting impacts” on the Trail.

Cowpasture River Preservation Association and others filed a petition in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for review of the Forest Service’s record of decision and special use permit. The court granted the petition, vacated the record of decision and special use permit, and remanded to the Forest Service. Notably, the court determined that the Forest Service lacked authority to grant the right-of-way under the Mineral Leasing Act because the Appalachian Trail is a “unit” of the National Park System. The court determined that the Mineral Leasing Act “specifically excludes” the Trail “from the authority of the Secretary of the Interior ‘or appropriate agency head’ to grant pipeline rights of way.” -- Oyez

Related Stories:

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Sorry, they need to lay some pipe.  It will be buried and you'll forget it's even there in a year or two. 


Apparently you have been to the area where the MVP wants to bury the pipe on Peters Mountain. The MVP will be a permanent scare on the landscape, visible for nearly 100 miles along the AT in WV and VA. The impacts to the trail aren't quite aqs bad, but will be a permanent scare on the atea in the Washingtion National Forest. Forest fragramentation is a real issue affectt both humans and animals. 


Can't forget it's there. Not to mention the danger this pipeline brings in a karst geography (like the one where they're trying to place it) its also a huge eye sore, and nothing will hide it. I hope no company ever comes and take your property. I'm sure you wouldn't feel the same way you do now.


As a retired seasonal national park ranger and naturalist, I'm extremely gratefull that other retirees such as Jarvis, are continuing to defend our parks. I particularly trust the North Cascades Institute's endorsment of this action, because they're fom my back yard.


Not when it blows up and catches the forest on fire and traps 10,000 people on the mountain with no way out. 


When it starts leaking and the oil kills all the trees and animals in the area we will most certianly know that ugly pipe is there.  Stop distroying nature.

 


Stop the insanity 

Stop the war on nature

Please 


"...developers cannot slice through FEDERAL LANDS IN NATIONAL PARK SITES without explicit approval from Congress."

The pro-pipeline side would have you believe that the ENTIRE AT comprises federal lands in national parks. This is complete BS. Most of the trail exists on state or private lands that DO NOT fall under the jurisdiction of the federal government. Dominion basically drew some stright lines on a map (because they thought it would be cheapest) and now refuses to accept that they made an expensive mistake. Maybe those 2 engineers who spent "hours" determining the route over "about a week" could have done some more research. But then Dominoin usually gets whatever it wants, so I guess they thought federal law didnt matter...

https://atlanticcoastpipeline.com/news/2017/12/28/pipeline-architects-wi...


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.