You are here

Why is Clear-cutting Allowed in Japan's Iconic Park, Daisetsuzan?

Share

Published Date

February 23, 2009

Daisetsuzan National Park is to Japan what Yellowstone is to the United States. And yet, the Japanese government permits clear-cutting in the park. Photos by Dennis Whigham and Toshimi Ichikawa.

Editor's note: In an effort to better understand how other countries are managing their parklands, and to compare and contrast U.S. efforts to those from abroad, Traveler on occasion run items from beyond U.S. borders. This post questions why Japan allows clear-cutting in its iconic park, Daisetsuzan National Park.

What would you think if logging were permitted in Yellowstone National Park, or if a rock quarry were allowed in Yosemite National Park, or if uranium mining was under way in Grand Canyon National Park?

Of course, these are only theoretical questions, as these consumptive uses are prohibited in these icons of the National Park System. But not all national park systems around the world hold such protective covenants for their parks.

For example, consider the plight of Daisetsuzan National Park. It is revered in Japan as that nation’s iconic park. Covering 900 square miles on the island of Hokkaido, the park contains active volcanoes, deep forests, brown bears, and cataracts that surge with spring snowmelt.
Last August, the park was the focus of a National Geographic magazine photo spread and essay by Gretel Ehrlich. Lush with gorgeous pictures of the park whose name translates to “big snow mountain” and the rich prose of Ms. Ehrlich, the story presented an idyllic setting.

“Fire and water collide in Daisetsuzan. Two massive volcanoes pin the national park at the center of Japan’s northernmost island, Hokkaido, their steaming peaks dropping off into forested, snow-pillowed, river-washed slopes – have a million acres churned green, orange, red, and white by the seasons,” wrote Ms. Ehrlich in opening her essay.

Unfortunately, her ensuing words didn’t quite tell the park’s entire story.

As the accompanying pictures clearly show, not all of Daisetsuzan National Park is as idyllic or protected in the American sense of national park protection. The images were captured by Dr. Dennis Whigham, senior scientist and deputy director of the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center in Maryland, and Toshimi Ichikawa, who is striving to protect the park's old-growth forests.

Along with Charles Wilkinson, the Moses Lasky Professor of Law at the University of Colorado, and Dr. Michael Hutchings, a professor from the University of Sussex in England, Dr. Whigham had visited Daisetsuzan in August prior to attending an international symposium on forest ecosystems in Sapporo, Japan.

One of the purposes of the symposium was to discuss in public the destruction of old growth and mature forests in Daisetsuzan. After returning home and seeing the National Geographic article, the three felt it necessary to speak out against the logging and, hopefully, raise the public’s consciousness.

“The clear-cutting that we observed was almost beyond belief in the level of destruction; both on the affected sites and in adjacent valley environments now receiving massive amounts of runoff from the clearcuts,” said the three. “It is almost unimaginable to us from the USA and UK that actions of this sort are permitted in one of the most beautiful parks in the world.
“The accompanying photographs show another side of activities in the park that citizens of Japan and the world need to know about.”

If you agree, you can contact Dr. Shoichi Kawano, president of The Conservation Network for Forest Ecosystems in Japan, about how that country’s policies that allow this type of logging in a national park setting can be changed. Dr. Kawano can be reached at this email address: [email protected].

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

I surely wouldn't stand for seeing this in any US park. But, there are other models of parks where logging may be an appropriate. One example is based off of the Biosphere Reserve . In this model core zones are heavily protected, buffer zones are heavily managed, while in a transition zone consumptive activities can take place. Many "national parks" around the world even have large populations of people living within their boarders (No, not seasonal employees).

I guess I cannot agree or disagree (and shouldn't) until I find out how the park was setup. I'll have to do some digging.


I was able to find an official website that seems to show a protection plan and a use plan. Unfortunately I can't understand Japanese. However, Google can translate non image based text. Here is a link with a map of the park and a translated explanation of the management (it is very brief, and doesn't provide conclusive evidence of a biosphere reserve use model).


Very sad to see such an amazing park that takes hundrends of years to establish itself as we can see it today in a threat of demolition within months or a year. We as the Conservationist must fight as much as we can once we see something something is going wrong or threatened which require conservation voices regardless our nationalities.By the way, it is our right to received the respect we require at our best regarding the technical advice we deliver in term of conservation and other proffessionals must understand this. I'm very angry with these greed ( politicians!!??) who are pushing this activities, may be looking for votes and or loggers!!!?? who they think that their proffessional is much better than others!!


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.