Elk on private lands within Grand Teton National Park can be hunted, the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has agreed/NPS file
Wolves, grizzly bears, and other wildlife can be hunted on private inholdings in Grand Teton National Park, the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled.
The ruling stemmed from a National Park Service decision in 2014 that its wildlife regulations did not apply to 2,300 acres of privately or state-owned land inside the park that hugs Wyoming's western border. Among the organizations challenging that interpretation were the National Parks Conservation Association and the Greater Yellowstone Coalition, which maintained in a lawsuit that the National Park Service's authority inside national parks extended to private lands within those borders.
“We are committed to ensuring Grand Teton National Park’s remarkable wildlife is managed consistently throughout the park and with the highest level of protection possible, which park visitors expect,” Sharon Mader, NPCA's Grand Teton program manager, said in 2016 when the lawsuit was filed. “For more than 65 years, the National Park Service rightfully and lawfully exercised authority to protect all park wildlife. It should continue to do so moving forward.”
The Park Service changed its position regarding who had authority to manage wildlife on inholdings within Grand Teton after a wolf was killed on private land inside the park. In November 2014 the Park Service agreed with the Wyoming Game and Fish Department that state laws, not the Park Service's, applied to private inholdings in the park.
For many years we assumed that 36 CFR [§] 2.2 applied on private inholdings within Grand Teton and prohibited the taking of wildlife on those inholdings. While NPS continues its interest in ensuring that wildlife management on private inholdings does not negatively impact park resources, we have concluded that 36 CFR [§] 2.2 does not apply to private inholdings within Grand Teton.
In upholding a lower court's ruling that the Park Service lacked jurisdiction over private and state lands inside Grand Teton, the 10th Circuit last Wednesday agreed with the Park Service's 2014 November determination. Key in the pertinent section of the Federal Code regarding hunting in national parks, 36 C.F.R. § 2.2, is that the Park Service holds jurisdiction only over lands "that are under the legislative jurisdiction of the United States.”
When Grand Teton was expanded in size in 1950, Wyoming's Legislature never ceded its jurisdiction over the private and state inholdings to the federal government, the court pointed out, and so the Park Service never held jurisdiction over those lands within Grand Teton.
“I am most gratified that the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals recognized that the State of Wyoming has not ceded its authority to the National Park Service regarding inholdings within Grand Teton National Park,” said Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon. “This is a critical underpinning for wildlife management in this part of Wyoming and gives due recognition to joint management and the strong relationship we have with GTNP, which has always been important to Wyoming.”
Comments
Hunting IS protecting and managing wildlife. Big win for private property and states rights as well as for hunters
Just look for the NPS to prohibit you from taking hides, antlers or meat from hunting on in-holdings across NPS property then, as this would comply with the text of the Court's ruling.
As a wildlife biologist, I can tell you that wildlife management is just as corrupt as the rest of the government - it's not about helping animals, its not about preserving resources, it's about controlling people and taking away their rights and their private property. There is no such thing as the scientific community, it's all about money. The only research that gets published are the studies that produce the results the people with the money want it to say. The same is true in medicine, pharmacy, etc. YOU are just as wise as any scientific "expert." Maybe wiser.
Another unconstitutional piece of adminstrative law in the way of liberty and public access. How did we ever let this happen!?!
Excellent and profound comment, I have often wondered how a biologist with a college degree and 20 years of experience could have more sway than a 60-year-old 3rd generation rancher. I have an upper-division college degree and 30 years of experience and you might be surprised at what I don't know.
I have to agree, give one of these officials a badge, or a title, and they become tools of the organization .. its all about controlling people once they put on the badge.. they have the authority, you do what they tell you - in their view, they are serving the greater good, the state, but the 'state', as an organization, is filled with corrupt people, all bent on control.
That NPS property you are talking about belongs to WE THE PEOPLE, we just hired NPS to manage it for ys.
Don Fry..you are spot on. More people need to remember that. It is OUR land, not the NPS