You are here

PEER: Ironman Competition Eyed For Blue Ridge Parkway Conflicts With NPS Policies

Share

Published Date

January 31, 2022

The Blue Ridge Parkway is not the appropriate venue for a commercial Ironman race, according to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility/NPS file

A proposal to close a section of the Blue Ridge Parkway for an Ironman competition runs counter to National Park Service policies and regulations, according to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.

The proposed race would close 21 miles of the scenic highway to the public for a day in early June to allow for the road bike component of the race.

The Special Use Permit request comes from The IRONMAN Group, which wants 21 miles of the bicycle ride during its triathlon to take place on the Parkway on Sunday, June 5. The permit application requests a full closure of both directions of the motor road take effect the afternoon of Saturday, June 4, from Milepost 91 (VA State Route 43) to Milepost 112 (VA State Route 24); and reopen by mid-afternoon on Sunday, June 5.

The National Park Service is taking public comment on the race proposal through February 1.

A key issue with the proposal, PEER said in its comments [attached below] to the competition, is that the Ironman Group is a commercial entity and that the activity conflicts with the National Park Service Organic Act.

"PEER reminds the NPS that the Organic Act requires that the NPS conserve the resources of the parks and manage the parks for 'enjoyment.' A park visitor riding a bicycle on the Blue Ridge Parkway, either singly or in a group, clearly falls within the 'enjoyment' that the governing law contemplates. The proposal by IRONMAN is not on a equal footing with the park visitor's bike ride. IRONMAN's proposal differs in its fundamental character," wrote the comments signed by Jeff Ruch, PEER's Pacific West director.

"Unlike a park visitor's bike ride, Advance Publications [the entity behind Ironman Group] stands to profit, indeed intends to profit, from the event. Thus, the event is, by its nature, a questionable use of National Park System areas," Ruch pointed out. "Embedded within this request for a permit, this commercial event is also intended to create profits for the media that will record, live-stream and broadcast the event."

Because the event's use of the Parkway could set a precedent for how parks can be used, the Park Service would need to apply a stricter standard of scrutiny, such as generating an environmental assessment, in considering whether it's appropriate, the comments noted.

Furthermore, Ruch wrote, "parks are not to be managed as a special venue for spectacles, athletic competitions or the like developed to be a cash register for the promoters." He also pointed out that there are plenty or roads near the Parkway that could handle the cycling component of the race.

Related Stories:

Stories about:

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

The NPS for decades has temporarily closed off portions of NPS units for commercial filming purposes.

The Blue Ridge Parkway itself has closed sections for filming for such movies as "The Fugitive" and "Forest Gump".  What's the difference?


The NPS is doing the right thing and taking comments and input. by this logic the NYC Marathon shouldn't start at Gateway!   The Marine Corps Marathon shouldn't impact parts of several parks in the DC area.  That darn Cherry Blossom Festival is problematic as well!   

Let the park openly take comments and listen to the public and actually render a decision Before the lecturing begins! 


There is no difference of course, except PEER has its favorites.  Of course, if  PEER benefits from the activitity on NPS property, then it's fine.

 

 


One hundred percent AGAINST IRONMAN!


These seems like a silly argument, there are plenty of well established for-profit athletic races on NPS land. Vacation races has a whole "National Park Series" of half marathons... and of course, even if the BR Parkway isn't one of them, NPS manages a ton of parks precisely to be "special venues for spectacles, athletic competitions or the like developed to be a cash register for the promoters." (E.g. Wolf Trap) I don't see any basis for saying that NPS can't permit park land to be used as an event venue.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.