You are here

Interior Officials Urged To Support NPS Rule On Hunting And Trapping In Alaskan Preserves

Share

Published Date

June 3, 2023

Top Interior Department officials have been urged to get behind the NPS on proposed changes to bear-baiting regulations/NPS file

Top Interior Department officials have been urged by former National Park Service managers in Alaska to support the Park Service's proposed changes to hunting and trapping regulations in national preserves in the state.

The change in the hunting regulations would be a reversal of a Trump administration reversal of the regulations. Back in the fall of 2015 the Park Service adopted rules regarding hunting and trapping in those national preserves where sport hunting is allowed. Under those regulations, hunters on national preserves could not:

  • Use bait (donuts, grease-soaked bread, etc.) to hunt bears;
  • Use artificial light to spotlight dens to kill black bears; and
  • Kill bear cubs or sows with cubs.
  • Take wolves and coyotes (including pups) during the denning season (between May 1 and August 9)
  • Take swimming caribou
  • Take caribou from motorboats under power
  • Take black bears over bait
  • Use dogs to hunt black bears

But the Trump administration threw out those regulations. In announcing the change at the time, the Park Service said its new position affirmed "the state of Alaska’s role in wildlife management on Alaska national preserves, consistent with the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act and Department of the Interior policies guiding the federal-state relationship in the management of fish and wildlife."

That change took effect in 2020.

But last fall a federal judge said the Park Service had erred in relaxing its hunting and trapping regulations, ruling that the agency was wrong in believing it had to "defer to state hunting regulations." U.S. District Judge Sharon L. Gleason also held that the Park Service acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it concluded that Alaska's wildlife management requirements were equivalent to those of the Park Service, and when it ignored its own previous finding that Alaska's regulations failed to address public safety concerns associated with bear baiting.

The new regulation is expected to reduce visitor use conflicts and concerns over potential safety issues related to bear baiting and would also restore consistency between harvest practices allowed in national preserves and NPS management policies with respect to natural processes, abundances and wildlife behavior, said a Park Service release issued this past January.

A group of former Park Service managers with extensive experience leading national parks, monuments and preserves in Alaska, along with former Alaska state officials, sent a letter to Shannon Estenoz, the Interior Department’s assistant secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks, on behalf of the Coalition to Protect America’s National Parks. In the letter they pointed out the need to reverse the regulations. 

The letter commends Alaska Regional Director Sarah Creachbaum and NPS staff for their work on the proposed rule on Hunting and Trapping in National Preserves in Alaska. It also offers support for the rule itself, which reinstates bans on state-sanctioned sport hunting practices, such as killing black bear sows and cubs at den sites; killing wolves and coyotes, including pups, during denning season; and harvesting brown bears over bait, in national preserves in Alaska.

“Bear baiting, killing mother bears with cubs while they hibernate, and shooting wolves with young pups are hunting practices that do not belong on lands under the stewardship of the National Park Service,” said Jonathan Jarvis, former Park Service director and former superintendent of Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve. “These methods are not just cruel and unethical, they conflict with NPS wildlife conservation mandates and policies.”

Tony Knowles, former Governor of Alaska and former Chair of the National Park System Advisory Board, added that "[I]t is vitally important to protect this incredible wildlife for current and future generations of Americans. The sustainable, scientific, and humane hunting requirements in the proposed NPS hunting regulations for Alaskan National Preserves will reinstate an essential policy to protect wildlife that was under siege.”

The letter also calls attention to the 1982 Master Memorandum of Understanding between the NPS and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, which laid out a clear understanding of each agency’s authority and responsibility to manage and conserve wildlife in the national preserves. 

“The Alaska Department of Fish & Game is no longer complying with the letter and intent of the 1982 MMOU,” said Jim Stratton, former director of Alaska State Parks. “The state has lost its way. The National Park Service, on the other hand, is doing its job consistent with federal law, judicial opinions, and the MMOU.” 

The letter cites multiple federal court rulings affirming federal authority to preempt state hunting regulations on federal lands, then goes on to “encourage the NPS to continue its efforts to consult and cooperate with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game to resolve, when feasible, situations in which state hunting regulations conflict with NPS mandates and policies.”

Mike Murray, chair of the Coalition to Protect America’s National Parks, supports the message brought forward by the group of former federal and state officials. “They clearly represent the voices of experience on this issue,” Murray said.

Comments

Is it really unethical for indigenous subsistence hunters to take swimming caribou when they have been doing so for thousands of years?  I think not as this method of feeding your family is ethical and humane especially when considering how most livestock is killed.  Lets be clear, subsistence hunters are not hunting for sport:  They hunt for food.  Will government land managers get in the way of feeding indigenous families based on differing ethics when harvesting swimming caribou, especially when there is no evidence to support that this method is detrimental to a population? Science is supposed to be the guide to wildlife management and not an outsiders' feelings and ethics. The proposal to get rid of this method of hunting for subsistence hunters is offensive to Natives.  Why can't the NPS learn better than this?  I hope Native groups take note and raise their voice on this one.


Hunting swimming Caribou Llows a hunter to examine and choose their meats, brain shot, instant death, no pain, no wasted meat, no wounded, c lean atvthe rivers edge. No c alves separated from their cow, no Cows taken.

Tradional and viable as a hunting method to get enough food in Gall for winter in the Arctic 

 


Did subsistence hunters shoot bears over a pile of donuts?  I don't think so.  The Trump era changes were shameful.


I just don't think it's right for the hunters to go off and shoot mother bears and cubs during denning season, and wolves and.swimmimg Caribou. If mankind is to kill those people. They will become a brink of extinction. I believe it is a inhumane and cruel practice. for hunters to shoot mother bears and cubs in dens. That goes along with the wolves and swimming Caribou. . I truly believe it's a cold hearted and cruel practice to shoot those animals 


Indigenous Alaskans have a sovereign right to exist "on lands under the stewardship of the National Park Service" without constantly being diminished, threatened, and dictated to by the dominant settler culture and its attempt to control animals.  The sentiments expressed in the supportive comments described here should be reason enough to abandon this process.  It's time to stop judging Native lifeways by colonial standards.


This rule does not apply to Native subsistence users.  This rule is about SPORT HUNTERS, and only fixes a screw-up from the State of Alaska. 

And there really are no "outsiders" when it comes to making sure caribou survive with natural and healthy populations at a time of global warming and preliminary engineering work to develop open pit mines in the caribou migration route, poisoning the river caribou swim across.  Caribou population is plummeting due to the confused attention and priority of the State.

All Americans should care, and make sure the land owned by all Americans is managed right. Native Hunters and the National Park Service worked together to create a special "subsistence preference" when the State of Alaska opposed special rights for local rural residents.  Without the "outsiders" working with Alaska Natives there would be NO subsistence special uses in parks and refuges.  The National Rifle Association fought long and hard against Natives and against National Park Service to make it impossible for the Federal Government to protect subsistence rights.  You have that one backward. 

The sport hunting -- that means for hunters who do NOT qualify for customary and traditional subsistence hunting and fishing -- may hunt only in the park preserves.  If what you are saying about yourself is you hunt the Caribou of the Western Arctic Herd, those non-subsistence people may only hunt in that part of the Gates of the Arctic National Preserve on the Kobuk River.  The area of the park most people call "the Boot," near the villlage of Kobuk, over as far as Walker Lake.  

Everybody should know the people pushing killing baby wolves - pups -- or bear -- cubs -- try to confuse and anger people who ARE the local people, by tangling sport hunting rules with subsistence.  Do not fall into that deliberate trap.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.