You are here

National Monument Proposed For North Dakota Near Theodore Roosevelt National Park

Share

By

Kurt Repanshek

Published Date

November 25, 2024
There's an effort to create a Mah Daah Hey National Monument in the Little Missouri watershed around Theodore River National Park (pictured here)/Kurt Repanshek

There's an effort to create a Mah Daah Hey National Monument in the Little Missouri watershed around Theodore Roosevelt National Park (pictured here)/Kurt Repanshek

With time running out on the Biden administration, a push is underway to have President Joe Biden designate a national monument on nearly 140,000 acres in North Dakota next to Theodore Roosevelt National Park.

Those behind the effort cite the region's long ties to Indigenous cultures and threats posed by "[C]orporate oil and gas development and its associated infrastructure." Proposed to be situated on 11 non-motorized backcountry designated areas of the Dakota Prairie Grasslands in the Badlands of the Little Missouri River Basin of western North Dakota, the envisioned Maah Daah Hey National Monument would link the north and south units of Theodore Roosevelt National Park.

It also would be threaded by the existing 144-mile-long Maah Daah Hey Trail, which touches "[M]ajestic plateaus, jagged peaks and valleys, large expanses of rolling prairie, and rivers ... to offer the adventurous outdoors enthusiast a taste of pure, unadulterated wilderness." Hikers, backpackers, and trail runners make up about 70 percent of trail usage, according to the Mah Daah Hey Trail Association, while mountain bikers account for about 24 percent, and equestrain about 6 percent.

The Mandan and Hidatsa tribes have deep connections with this landscape. "In the Mandan language, the phrase 'Maah Daah Hey' means “grandfather, long-lasting,'" those behind the effort say. "It is used to describe things or an area that have been or will be around for a long time and is deserving of respect."

Traditionally, tribal members  would come from the Heart and Knife River confluences to the Little Missouri region to trap eagles, hunt bison, and gather medicinal plants.

In 1851, during negotiations at Fort Laramie in Wyoming Territory, the tribes were given the northern terrain of the Little Missouri River drainage.

The boundaries of the Mandan, Hidatsa, and Sahnish (Arikara) territory were set-aside in the 1851 Fort Laramie Treaty: Commencing at the mouth of the Heart River; thence up the Missouri to the mouth of the Yellowstone River; thence up the Yellowstone to the mouth of Powder River, thence in a southeasterly direction to the headwaters of the Little Missouri River, thence along the Black Hills to the headwaters of the Heart River; thence down the Heart River to the place of the beginning.

Part of that territory today is the Little Missouri Grassland District of the Dakota Prairie National Grasslands. In 1993 there was an effort by the two tribes, along with The Wilderness Society, National Wildlife Federation, National Parks and Conservation Association, American Rivers and others to have an official wilderness designation placed on much of the landscape, but it was unsuccessful.

"The landscape has long been inhabited by native people. The area in the proposed monument is under massive threat from development," proponents of monument designation say. "Oil and gas wells and their associated infrastructure continue to invade some of the wildest places in North Dakota. The proposed national monument would bring permanent conservation of 139,729 acres of the North Dakota Badlands along and near the Maah Daah Hey Trail."

The proposal didn't indicate which federal lands management agency the monument should be placed under, though the Dakota Prairie National Grasslands is managed by the U.S. Forest Service.

Support National Parks Traveler

National Parks Traveler is a small, editorially independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit media organization. The Traveler is not part of the federal government nor a corporate subsidiary. Your support helps ensure the Traveler's news and feature coverage of national parks and protected areas endures. 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

According to a map included in the environmentalists' own proposal on page 6, the 11 proposed parcels are non-contiguous and would in no way "link the north and south units of Theodore Roosevelt National Park".  

The words used and the maps displayed in the proposal just don't jive.

Both ND Senators have made negative comments about this proposal, so....

Here's the proposal: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/66d752c90ef02c51604b6443/t/673b86...


While he won't yet be in power, this would be a great litmus test for our incoming Secretary of the Interior on which he is going to prioritize. He's a big oil and gas proponent, but many have also pointed out his strong support for outdoor rec. Would he protect the land around the Maa Dah Hey Trail, or leave it open to oil and gas? Would love to know where incoming SOI Bergum would fall on this issue in his own state. 


So, Joe B will declare the monument, then Trump II will undeclare the monument, then we're back to square one,

 

So what.

Enough of this tit for tat.  Either garner local and state support for monuments, or just move on.


Mah Daah Hey Trail, 

 

Having hiked much of the MDH Trail, it's not really that "majestic" worthy of any nat'l designatiin or protection through the monument process.  And that was the consensus of other trail users.  Sure, it's nice, maybe even REALLY nice for a city slicker, but it's just not a standout trail.  


As someone who lives on the area they are talking about and litterly just found put about this tonight it shows just how much they've actually published this proposal and told the land owners directly affected by this if the monument actually passes through. Billings county ND has enough to worry about going on within our county without the government swooping in and trying to change everything. I honestly don't know why they would think this is a good idea and if it's going off of Teddy Rosavelt living here for a period of his life they are ignoring a large part of our history that doesn't involve the town of medora. In my personal opinion they need to leave it not declared a national monument and continue allowing the grazing association to help make sure that the land is using it properly. I know most of us ranchers that live here don't want our current pastures becoming a monument for people that it doesn't effect them whether it is or isnt.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.