Last month, during the Memorial Day Weekend, traffic waiting to enter Arches National Park backed up so far onto U.S. 191 that the Utah Highway Patrol temporarily shut off access to the redrock wonder. That dilemma prompted a suggestion by the park superintendent that perhaps the time had come to issue reservations for people hoping to visit Arches.
Visitation to Arches has been on somewhat of a meteoric rise. Superintendent Kate Cannon is predicting that visitation to her park will reach 1.5 million this year, while just five years ago it was at 1 million.
"I would say that level of visitation is beyond our current capacity," she told reporters.
But the superintendent's suggestion that reservations be required during the busy summer tourist season -- "We would give visitors certainty so they would know before they got here that they would get into Arches National Park," she said -- is not being welcomed by Moab area businesses.
Arches is not alone with crowding issues. Yosemite National Park's iconic valley is jammed from Memorial Day through Labor Day. Trying to find a parking spot on the South Rim of Grand Canyon National Park in the summer can be grueling. Elbows can help you get a good view of Old Faithful in Yellowstone National Park when it erupts during a warm August afternoon. October's leaf-peeping season brings tremendous stop-and-go conga lines to traffic winding along Skyline Drive in Shenandoah National Park or down the Blue Ridge Parkway.
With such crowding only expected to get worse -- and knowing that more crowding can have a negative impact on park resources (wildlife, vegetation, trails) -- do you think some national parks should implement a reservations system for visitors during the busiest of tourist seasons?
Comments
There are so many open questions here it is hard to provide a definitive answer. Will their be reservation fees? What's the penalty for not showing up? Will a reservation be required or just an option to get you to the front of the line? Will people be turned away at the gate when the park is half empty? If the issues is lack of gate capacity (as was the case in the Arches article) and traffic is backed up for miles, how does the guy with the reservation two miles back in line get in?
Yes.
It may be the only viable answer to a terribly difficult problem.
Demand based pricing would be far easier and less expensive to implement and would spread usage to periods of lesser demand.
In my own view of the issue, I have found that reservation systems work quite well. It can be offset with holding some back for first come first serve or no shows. Recent experience both at the Washington Monument and Mammoth Cave were very well done. Reservation systems should be implemented during the prime time seasons, it is an equitable approach, I would be opposed to demand based pricing, these are public lands, opportunities to visit them during prime time should not be based on the ability to pay. I am surprised the gateway communities would be opposed. They would stand to gain from these systems, as signs would indicate when the park is full, options would be to stay at local business establishments where reservations could be obtained. Really worked for me at those areas that have these systems. It did entail some advanced planning and /or flexibility when traveling, but it works.
sure. Anything to help the NPS and goold ole Canadian based Recreation.gov
But only if there are fees to do so. Perhaps the NPS should consider charging people to use the parks.
I love the campground reservation system through Recreation.gov. It's very comforting to know that I'll have a place to lay my little head when I arrive. And I don't have to pull into a park in the wee hours hoping I'll find an open campsite. I've actually had to cancel reservations twice and even that has worked very well. There's a $10 charge to cancel, but the balance of the reservation was credited back to my account before day's end.
My experience at Chaco Canyon is an excellent example. I called for a reservation about a week before I wanted to visit. The agent told me there was one reservable campsite left so I took it. I learned later that about half the sites there may be reserved and the other half are first come. It would have been a royal bummer to drive all the way out those reservation roads to find no room in the inn.
Once when I tried to reserve may favorite campsite at a Utah state park, the site was taken, but the reservation agent suggested that if I got there one day later, I could have the site for up to four nights.
I'd worry a little about having local businesses handling reservations. I don't recall where it was, but wasn't there an article in Traveler awhile ago telling of some abuses by a concessionaire who was able to manipulate a reservation system to the disadvantage of others.
It would probably cause fewer hard feelings if people knew well in advance that reservations were going to be needed. It would certainly reduce the disappointment of pulling up at a park entrance after a long, long drive (are we there yet?) only to learn the park is full.
Whatever happens, it's awfully clear that something needs to be done.
*Some*thing has to be done about Yosemite Valley. I suspect a reservation system might be the only solution.
Yellowstone, OTOH, isn't that bad, even in August (speaking as someone who's been there at some point during every month between May and October). Even Old Faithful in August can be uncrowded if you know what you're doing.
Oh, and if you make reservations a bloody year and a half ahead of time to stay in the park, with Xanterra holding a night's stay as a deposit for each location for all that time. They've got $200 of my money for that long just so that I can spend 2 nights at Roosevelt and 3 nights at Old Faithful in 2016. *That's* just WRONG.
Gee, at current interest rates, $200 for a year is less than $5.00. Seems like a small price to pay.