You are here

Traveler's View: Don't Gravel Over Paradise

Share

Published Date

March 23, 2017

Tell Yellowstone officials not to build this parking lot near the Fairy Falls Trailhead/NPS graphic

Yosemite Valley is so crowded, why not build a temporary gravel lot in Cook's Meadow that could handle 75 vehicles?

Parking at the Logan Pass Visitor Center in Glacier National Park in August is near-impossible if you don't show up shortly after sunrise, so why not expand the lot with an acre of gravel in the meadow? And, surely, there must be a half-acre of ground near the summit of Cadillac Mountain at Acadia National Park where tour buses could idle while visitors take in the view of Frenchman Bay and sip some lemonade.

And if all those temporary solutions gain headway, why not make them permanent by paving over the gravel?

Of course, all those suggestions are ridiculous and wouldn't gain traction, let alone be vetted before the public. So why are Yellowstone National Park officials thinking of building a three-quarters-of-an-acre gravel lot near the Fairy Falls Trailhead that, while temporary at first bad thought, could turn into a permanent asphalt lot?

Although the trail leads to Fairy Falls and Imperial Geyser, another major draw is a hill along the route that offers a bird’s-eye view of the nearby Grand Prismatic Spring in Midway Geyser Basin. Social media and guidebooks started driving so many people to this location that Yellowstone crews are constructing an official trail and overlook to replace the many existing social trails on the hill. A formal trail to a spectacular view of the largest hot spring in the United States? It doesn’t take much imagination to see how the proposed temporary lot could become so popular that the park would be urged to lay down some asphalt.

Too many cars, trucks, and buses in Yellowstone? Surely there has to be a better solution than stripping two inches of topsoil and cutting down five lodgepole piness from a small slice of Yellowstone to create additional parking in a park that is struggling with record visitation. If this is the response to the nearly 4.3 million visitors who explored Yellowstone in 2016, what will the solution be when that tally bumps up to 4.5 million, or 4.75 million, or 5 million?

Yes, it can be frustrating to find a parking space at the often-busy Midway Geyser Basin. Of course, if drivers get fed up waiting for an opening, they could decide to turn the new temporary lot into a de facto “overflow” lot and walk about a mile back along the Grand Loop Road to the Midway boardwalk, negating any safety gains. And what happens when that parking lot is consistently full? Build another?

Yellowstone officials, in trying to justify this lot, note that once upon a time the ground had been disturbed by a freight road. Well, once upon a time a sprawling campground along with 215 cabins was located on the flanks of Sunrise in Mount Rainier National Park. Though those cabins were removed in the 1930s and 1940s, should the Park Service justify rebuilding a cabin city there on the grounds that other park campgrounds are insufficient to handle demand and, by the way, this area had previously been disturbed?

"It's critical that we don't get caught in a cycle of simply creating new parking lots or expanding infrastructure in a one-off manner. This approach could negatively impact the very natural resources visitors flock to Yellowstone to view," Stephanie Adams, the Yellowstone Program manager for the National Parks Conservation Association, told the Traveler. "NPCA will be submitting comments on the parking lot project encouraging the Park Service to hit the brakes on the parking lot and complete a long-term infrastructure and visitation plan for Yellowstone over the next year."

We couldn't agree more.

Unfortunately, growing visitation to the National Park System's crown jewels is a given. The Park Service should not bow down to that visitation and see how many more folks its can squeeze into the parks by building more parking lots, more lodges, and more front-country campgrounds. Rather, as unfortunate as it also may be, the agency should move to set carrying capacities for the parks, and enforce existing parking regulations, to ensure these landscapes are not further eroded away by visitors and their rigs.

The comment period on this proposed gravel lot in Yellowstone runs through the end of March. Comment now.

Should Mount Rainier National Park rebuild this cabin city because of demand and the fact that there used to be one here at Sunrise?

Related Stories:

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Perhaps we can look at out of park structures like Hoover Dam and trolleys to carry people in the parks. 


Good luck. The obvious solution (shuttles and other forms of public transit to/from/in the parks) was fought tooth and nail even by more environmentally concerned administrations. People love their cars and the freedom they offer and won't give them up without a fight. Progress might be made by getting people out of their cars and off the very beaten paths to see what can be experienced just a short distance from the asphalt, but that, too, seems to be a pipe dream.


Why not expand public transportation within the parks so people don't have to drive in.  Hybrid buses would cause less pollution.  I would love it if I didn't have to drive in.  Pick up points at the entrances would lessen the traffic, buses taking park goers to all of the attractions would be so much nicer than lines of cars waiting for parking spaces.  Would have loved that in Smokey Mts.


These areas have not been set aside to create parking lots. What a waste of beauty and natural resource just to allow more people to pack in. Would rather see permit only, or daily limits out on traffic than see areas wasted in parking lots. It will never be enough, and soon, there will be nothing but parking facilities. 


You will never buld enough lots in the right places.....and the cost of decimating our precious park areas is too high of a price!  Get out of your cars and hop on a shuttle or walk!

 


There's a song about this, "Big Yellow Taxi".  Some of the verse is; ".. they paved paradise and put up a parking lot...".  We don't need more parking lots in paradise. 


I love our National Parks and have visited over half of them with the goal of someday seeing them all.  I get one 2 week vacation each summer to travel.  While the parking lots are unsightly and adverse to the natural environment, I would be devastated if I arrived at a park on the other side of the continent only to be denied entry because the park is full.  It seems like people are upset that so many others also enjoy the parks.  I enjoy the solitude of being the only one in a remote area of the parks, but with our population those moments are very rare.  We need to find creative solutions so that all Americans (and foreigners) can enjoy our amazing parks.  Everyone deserves to see these yet we don't want to destroy them with parking lots.  I sure hope top minds can find a way to construct eco friendly underground parking areas or something similar. 


Build the parking lots and make them large enough for RVs. Most of the parks are hundreds or thousands of acres and theres no reason I can think of that more and larger parking areas can't be made. It is much safer for pedestrians to walk in parking lots than along the edge of roadways. Especially families with young children. Safety first!


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.