You are here

OIG: National Park Service Director Skirted Ethics Office In Writing Book, Reprimanded

Share

Published Date

February 25, 2016

NPS Director Jon Jarvis has been reprimanded for ignoring Interior Department ethics rules/NPS

An investigation has found that National Park Service Director Jon Jarvis intentionally skirted the Interior Department's Ethics Office to write a book, a Guidebook to American Values and Our National Parks, for a cooperating association contractually tied to the Park Service, an action that brought the director an official reprimand from top Interior Department officials, who also removed him from any dealings with the Park Service's ethics office for the rest of his career as director.

Furthermore, Deputy Interior Secretary Michael Connor ordered Director Jarvis to receive monthly ethics training for the rest of his tenure. 

"I am also concerned about the attitude the (investigation) demonstrates Director Jarvis exhibited toward important Departmental institutions such as the Ethics Office, the Office of the Solicitor, and the Office of the Secretary," Deputy Secretary Connor wrote in a letter (attached below) to Mary L. Kendall, deputy inspector general for the department.

In a short statement Thursday evening the director said, "I regret that I did not seek guidance on the most appropriate path forward to publish this book. I wrote the book to inspire and engage more Americans in our national parks, particularly during the National Park Service's centennial year. I consider it a good lesson learned and will ask for guidance if and when similar situations arise in the future."

Interior's Office of Inspector General began looking into the matter last June after being alerted to the book published by Eastern National, a cooperating association that has been working with national parks for 50 years At issue was "whether Jarvis used his public office for private gain by seeking a book deal with Eastern National and whether he misused any U.S. Government resources in the process."

Ethics Office guidelines specifically state that government employees who want to do outside work with any business or organization seeking to do business with the Interior Department must first gain approval from the Ethics Office, regardless of whether there's payment involved. Additionally, an attorney in the Ethics Office said "that even if Jarvis was not personally receiving money from the sale of the book, having his name associated with it could create the appearance that he was using his official position for personal gain."

The investigation also showed that Director Jarvis approached Eastern National with the idea, but that he had told Interior Secretary Jewell that Eastern National had asked him to write the book. It also showed that Eastern National Chief Executive Officer George Minnucci, after discussing the project on the phone with the director, later wrote him an email worded as if the idea was his. In his interview with OIG staff, Mr. Minnucci said Director Jarvis had not asked him to word his email in such a way, but rather he did so because "he wanted his staff to think the book was his idea and that it was 'a CEO decision.'”

The OIG report (attached below) stated that Director Jarvis said he "did not consult with the Ethics Office on the book because doing so would have taken too long, and with NPS’ centennial approaching, the book would be 'really powerful.'”

"Jarvis explained that he was frustrated with the Ethics Office for not being able to approve 'very, very simple things,'" the report stated. "As an example, he explained that a thank-you letter to a donor from him and the Foundation took 6 weeks for the office to approve, which led him to believe that approving the book was going to be a problem."

In one interview with investigators, Director Jarvis said he wasn't afraid of taking chances, such as failing to clear the project with the Ethics Office.

I think I knew going into this there was a certain amount of risk. I’ve never been afraid of a risk. . . . I’ve gotten my ass in trouble many, many, many times in the Park Service by . . . not necessarily getting permission . . . I’ve always pushed the envelope. . . . And I felt that this values analysis . . . could be a very, very powerful tool to not only connect to the next generation but to resonate across political spectrums. 

“And from my view, from my experience, in the ethics world, having been an SES [Senior Executive Service employee] for almost a decade, I did not feel like I was violating any ethics issues because I set this up [with] no personal benefit, nothing gained for me personally," he continued. "What I was trying to prevent is having it edited."

While Director Jarvis did not seek to be paid for the book, and directed that any royalties go to the National Park Foundation, there was concern among some Interior officials that he retained the copyright to the title and allowed the use of the Park Service arrowhead logo on the cover and his title as Park Service director in places, "giving the appearance of Government endorsement."

In the end, it doesn't appear as if there will be any royalties for anyone. Eastern National officials told OIG investigators that while it had cost them $11,000-$12,000 to print the $7.95 book, they had only sold a little more than 200 copies and they didn't expect to make their investment back.

The investigation determined that Director Jarvis used his government iPad to write the manuscript; while he claimed to have worked on it outside office hours, the investigation determined that "it appears" there were at least nine occasions when Director Jarvis worked on it or corresponded with Eastern National officials concerning the book "on weekdays when he was not on leave and Government offices were open."

Comments

AGREED!


Hooray for Jarvis.  Wish we had more like him in Government.  This will certainly get his book more publicity that it otherwise had.  "The only thing worse than being talked about, is not being talked about."  "There is no such thing as bad publicity."


What exactly did this book accomplish?  I don't think it paid for itself, much less raise money for the National Park Service.  I wouldn't be surprised if I see it among the other cheap books on the remainder table.  Did his misconduct save lives?  Did it save resources?  It shows a disturbing lack of respect for the rule of law.  The fact that his career has absorbed multiple times of getting his ass in trouble, by his own admission, is strong evidence of how power and priviledge play out in the National Park Service.

I recently left the park service and my tenure there wasn't pleasant.  Superintendents appeared to have free reign to do as they pleased.  I would love for someone to compare the type of formal discpline given (or not given) to superintendents and commissioned rangers for known misconduct to the discipline received by lower graded employees who are often women and minorities. In my experience, NPS held secretaries and maintenance workers to higher standards than superintendents and law enforcement rangers.  It is all part of the culture that can allow the Grand Canyon sexual harassment to go unaddressed for so long.

Is it just a book?  No.  It's also a sweet deal with Budweiser, changing policy to appease Coca Cola, corporate logos on signs in the parks and on the sides of cars right along with the arrowhead. It's spending money on EEO settlements that could go towards the maintenance backlog, and offering reassignments to high graded employees who should have been terminated, would have been terminated had the worked in the private sector.

I'm not just disappointment with Jon Jarvis, I'm hurt more by my disappointment in Secretary Jewell.  I heard her speak not long after she became the Secretary of the Interior and I was impressed then.  I'm disappointed, though, that she passed up the perfect opportunity to start conversations about why ethics matter, why public officials must be above reproach, and why people in positions of power should be held to a higher standard.

The saddest thing, though, is that I no longer get the same emotional and spiritual value from visiting National Parks and other places with the National Park system as I did before I joined the National Park Service. I met and worked for and with some wonderful people.  The most valuable mentor I've had so far in my career with a National Park Service employee.  I am proud of the work I did, but I also witnessed some things that put a sad and bitter filter over what was once pure and beautiful.  I recently traveled through areas of some nice parks, but I found myself passing them by.  I'll need some time before I'll find them as enjoyable again.

That is part of the impact of this "harmless" book.


I retired 24 years ago after38 years of (US) Civil & Foreign Service.  My first Federal job, as a seasonal Ranger-Naturalist, GS-4, was one of most enjoyable ones.  For many decades, the NPS grade (and pay) structure was at the bottom of the pile, and perhaps it was a good thing that there were no jobs available when I got discharged from the US Army (we had mandatory service then).  I understand that the grades are now more comparable with those of other agencies.  The topic of Jarvis' book led me to corporate sponsorships. which is the result of Congress failing to appropriate sufficient funds!


To many people responding to this article, what Jonathan Jarvis did doesn't seem so bad. He didn't hurt anyone, he wrote a book about the National Park Service and says he'll donate any benefit to a non-profit that supports the NPS, and in the end, this case seems like just a lot of bureaucratic folderol.  The problem, however, is that Jon Jarvis isn't some lowly, uninformed Park Service employee and he isn't some newbie who didn't know any better.   He was and is the Director of the NPS.  He knew the rules, and according to the Inspector General's report, he was more or less aware he was violating some of the basic ethical rules that every federal employee is supposed to know and follow. And that's what is wrong!   Instead of complying with both the letter and spirit of the applicable regulations and setting an example by checking whenever there was any ambiguity in them or any uncertainty in how to interpret them, he tried to ignore them or work around them.  Equally bad is that he wasn’t really punished or disciplined.  To be sure, if the Director can ignore rules and redefine regulations or reinterpret them, and get away with it—or get away with only a minor reprimand---why shouldn't others ignore the rules and violate the regulations and/or do whatever they want----even if it’s blatant discrimination and/or retaliation, or even if they are committing obvious waste, fraud, and abuse?


Must agree Bruce.


Yep, crucify Jarvis.  Only BHO and Hillary are allowed to break the rules.   How about cleaning up the whole damn mess.


Mr. Jarvis should've bee commended instead of fully investigated by OIG who more than likely have bigger bears to catch in nation parks. He didn't try to make a profit which should be what makes this a lessor crime if a crime at all. Probably has a stellar record in NPS. My tax dollars are spent recklessly!! less


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.